Why not ponder or subsume?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29293/rdfg.v7i01.253

Keywords:

Decision. Ponder. Principles. Rules. Subsume., Decision, Ponder, Principles, Rules, Subsume

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the compatibility of the subsumption and the weighting, used to apply the rules and principles, with the needs of Contemporary Constitutionalism. It will be investigated whether proposals for decision-making techniques, widely adopted in the country's legal literature, are adequate to what is expected of a new legal paradigm called post-positivism (re-thought from the Democratic State of Law), anticipating that the hypothesis points in the direction of a negative answer, in view of the identity that is established between the above mentioned techniques and the positivist paradigm.

Author Biographies

  • Jeferson Dytz Marin, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.

    Doutor em Direito pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS). Mestre em Direito pela Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC). Coordenador e Professor do PPGD da Universidade de Caxias do Sul. Coordenador do grupo de pesquisa ALFAJUS. Diretor da Marin Advogados Associados.

  • Nelson Gularte Ramos Neto, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.

    Doutorando em Direito pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul. Mestre em Direito pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul. Procurador do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-21

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 01 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Jeferson Dytz Marin, Nelson Gularte Ramos Neto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright of published articles belongs to the author(s), with the journal's rights to the first publication, either printed and/or digital.

Author(s) may only use the same results in other publications when clearly indicating the Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi as the original publication medium. If there is no such indication, the journal will consider it a situation of self-plagiarism.

Articles published here can only be completely or partially reproduced if they expressly mention the origin of their publication as this journal, referring to the volume and number of this publication, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference. For legal purposes, the original publication source must be recorded.

As the Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi is an open access journal, the free use of articles in educational and scientific applications is allowed as long as the source is mentioned, according to the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional license (CC BY NC SA 4.0).

Licença Creative Commons

How to Cite

Why not ponder or subsume?. Guanambi College Law Journal, Guanambi, v. 7, n. 01, p. e253, 2020. DOI: 10.29293/rdfg.v7i01.253. Disponível em: https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13938.. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2024.