Still on the thesis of symbolic constitutionalization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29293/rdfg.v8i02.338

Keywords:

Symbolic Constitutionalizing. Marcelo Neves. Criticism. Brazil.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this paper is to offer a supplement to my critical analysis of Marcelo Neves' thesis of symbolic constitutionalizing.

METHOD: In this sense, from a methodological point of view, this supplement is based on a categorical reconstruction of the arguments of the 2018 postscript to his book “Constitution and law in peripheral modernity”.

RELEVANCE/ORIGINALITY: The relevance of this discussion lies in its contribution to a critical approach to Brazilian constitutional history, mainly post-1988.

RESULTS: The results show that the symbolic constitutionalizing thesis has three problems, in addition to those previously discussed in my essay “To a criticism of the symbolic constitutionalizing thesis”: a problem in the “sociological reduction” that it operates; a problem of adequacy between its conceptual framework and the conceptualized phenomenon; and a problem in its theoretical background.

THEORETICAL/METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: The main theoretical implication of this paper lies in its possible contribution to the development of a critical constitutional theory about the relationship between constitutionalism and periphery, which fundamental outlines I present in the last section.

   

Author Biography

  • David F. L. Gomes, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

    Professor da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG. Doutor, mestre e bacharel em Direito pela UFMG.

Published

2021-09-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Still on the thesis of symbolic constitutionalization. Guanambi College Law Journal, Guanambi, v. 8, n. 02, p. e338, 2021. DOI: 10.29293/rdfg.v8i02.338. Disponível em: https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13962.. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.