The judicial decisions with binding effect and the nuances of Brazilian imports from the precedent system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29293/rdfg.v7i01.297

Keywords:

Judiciary. Precedents. Civil Procedure. Binding.

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the concept of “precedent system” that was adopted by Brazilian doctrine after the validity of the Code of Civil Procedure, due to the interpretation given to the text of arts. 926 and 927. We point out that the legal provisions are intended only to give binding effect to certain judicial provisions, unlike the theory of stare decisis, and far from the ability to create legitimate precedents. Given this, we analyze the devices and their legal consequences to raise reflections about the affront to the tripartition of powers. Thus, we assert that while they are intended to provide the jurisdiction of the courts with greater legal certainty and predictability of outcome in their claims, it conceals in its core the real pretension, namely to increase the productivity of the judiciary and to produce mass judicial decisions, which certainly does not conform to the constitutional pillars of the rule of law.

Author Biographies

  • Oniye Nashara Siqueira, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (UNAERP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.

    Mestranda em Direitos Coletivos e Cidadania pela Universidade de Ribeirão Preto - UNAERP. Bolsista PROSUP/CAPES. Especialista em Processo Civil pela Universidade de São Paulo – USP e graduada em Direito pela Universidade de Ribeirão Preto – UNAERP. 

  • Ricardo Reis Silveira, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (UNAERP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.

    Possui graduação em Ciências Jurídicas pela Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto - UFOP (1999), Mestrado em Filosofia e Metodologia das Ciências pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCAR (2003), Doutorado em Filosofia e Metodologia das Ciências  pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCAR (2010). Atualmente é Advogado em Ribeirão Preto, Professor do Programa de Mestrado em Direitos Coletivos e Cidadania da Universidade de Ribeirão Preto - UNAERP, Professor Adjunto do Curso de Direito da Universidade de Ribeirão Preto - UNAERP.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-21

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 01 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Oniye Nashara Siqueira, Ricardo Reis Silveira

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright of published articles belongs to the author(s), with the journal's rights to the first publication, either printed and/or digital.

Author(s) may only use the same results in other publications when clearly indicating the Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi as the original publication medium. If there is no such indication, the journal will consider it a situation of self-plagiarism.

Articles published here can only be completely or partially reproduced if they expressly mention the origin of their publication as this journal, referring to the volume and number of this publication, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference. For legal purposes, the original publication source must be recorded.

As the Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi is an open access journal, the free use of articles in educational and scientific applications is allowed as long as the source is mentioned, according to the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional license (CC BY NC SA 4.0).

Licença Creative Commons

How to Cite

The judicial decisions with binding effect and the nuances of Brazilian imports from the precedent system. Guanambi College Law Journal, Guanambi, v. 7, n. 01, p. e297, 2020. DOI: 10.29293/rdfg.v7i01.297. Disponível em: https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13931.. Acesso em: 2 jul. 2024.