The evolution of contraditory in case law and in brazilian civil procedural law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29293/rdfg.v5i01.200

Keywords:

Procedure. Contradictory. Constitution of the Republic of Brazil.

Abstract

The present text / article tries to analyze the conceptual evolution of the contradictory before the Brazilian courts and throughout the 30 years of validity of the Constitution of the Republic of Brazil. The problem that we intend to discuss in the text is precisely the theoretical delay developed by the Brazilian judiciary over the course of 30. In order to find paradigmatic decisions, we intend to demonstrate that the judiciary does not guarantee the contradiction in an effective way. In order to arrive at the answer we use the methodology of bibliographical revision and jurisprudence.

 

Author Biography

  • Carlos Henrique Soares, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC/MG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

    Doutor e Mestre em Direito Processual (PUC/MG). Professor de graduação em Direito Processual Civil (PUC/MG) Professor de Pós-Graduação. Professor Colaborador do Mestrado em Direito Processual (PUCMInas no 1/2012), Coordenador do Curso de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual Civil (IEC-Barreiro); Professor de Graduação da Escola Superior Dom Helder Câmara, Professor de Pós-graduação e graduação da Unifenas, Professor visitante do Mestrado e Doutorado da Universidade de Medelin, Palestrante. Escritor de livros e Artigos. Advogado Militante. Membro do Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual. Membro do Instituto Panamericano de Direito Processual. Membro do Instituto dos Advogados de Minas Gerais.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-31

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 01 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Carlos Henrique Soares

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright of published articles belongs to the author(s), with the journal's rights to the first publication, either printed and/or digital.

Author(s) may only use the same results in other publications when clearly indicating the Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi as the original publication medium. If there is no such indication, the journal will consider it a situation of self-plagiarism.

Articles published here can only be completely or partially reproduced if they expressly mention the origin of their publication as this journal, referring to the volume and number of this publication, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference. For legal purposes, the original publication source must be recorded.

As the Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi is an open access journal, the free use of articles in educational and scientific applications is allowed as long as the source is mentioned, according to the Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional license (CC BY NC SA 4.0).

Licença Creative Commons

How to Cite

The evolution of contraditory in case law and in brazilian civil procedural law. Guanambi College Law Journal, Guanambi, v. 5, n. 01, p. 115–139, 2018. DOI: 10.29293/rdfg.v5i01.200. Disponível em: https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13901.. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.