Right to privacy, collision between fundamental rights and balance

reflections on STJ decisions based on Robert Alexy's theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29293/rdfg.v7i02.301

Keywords:

Fundamental rights. Legal principles. Balancing. Superior Justice Tribunal. Robert Alexy.

Abstract

This research work analyzes the methodological assumptions of the interpretation and concretization of the right to privacy based on the decisions made by the Superior Court of Justice from 2012 to 2019. The objective is to check how such courts effect the balance of constitutional principles in collision. In addition, it is investigated whether the reasons for the decisions are adequate to the postulates of weighting and proportionality examination according to the theory of legal argument proposed by Robert Alexy.

Author Biographies

  • Alexandre de Castro Coura, Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (FDV), Vitória, ES, Brasil.

    Doutor e Mestre em Direito Constitucional pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Professor do programa de pós-graduação em sentido estrito (mestrado e doutorado) da Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (FDV). Líder do Grupo de Pesquisa CNPq “Hermenêutica Jurídica e Jurisdição Constitucional”. Promotor de Justiça no Estado do Espírito Santo.

  • Júlia Teixeira Ramos, Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (FDV), Vitória, ES, Brasil.

    Pós Graduanda em Direito do Trabalho e Direito Processual do Trabalho. Bacharel em Direito pela FDV.

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Right to privacy, collision between fundamental rights and balance: reflections on STJ decisions based on Robert Alexy’s theory. Guanambi College Law Journal, Guanambi, v. 7, n. 02, p. e301, 2020. DOI: 10.29293/rdfg.v7i02.301. Disponível em: https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13946.. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2024.