Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method

ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29293/rdfg.v6i02.269

Keywords:

Extension. Research-action. Methodology. Intersectionality.

Abstract

The aim of the text is to show an articulation between the action research methodology developed by Michel Thiollent and the intersectionality method (s), which was coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw. For this, the problem of modern sciences is articulated as neutral sciences and how action research overcomes the problems left by them enabling a qualitative leap and better suited to the applied social sciences. Then, we proceed to the conceptualization and articulation of the key concepts to finally demonstrate the articulation between action research and intersectionality (s) in practice by Federal Universities. The methodology used is the critical methodological.

Author Biographies

  • Rainer Bomfim, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil.

    Mestrando em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP). Bacharel em Direito pela UFOP. Membro e Coordenador da linha de extensão do Grupo de Estudos “Omissão Legislativa e o papel do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça: estudo sobre a ADO. n. 26”.

  • Alexandre Gustavo Melo Franco de Moraes Bahia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil.

    Doutor pela UFMG. Professor Adjunto na UFOP e IBMEC-BH. Bolsista de Produtividade do CNPq. Coordenador Docente do Núcleo de Direito Humanos.

  • Marina Souza Lima Rocha, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil.

    Mestranda em Direito pela UFOP. Bolsista UFOP.  Membro do Grupo de Pesquisa “RESSABER – Estudos em Saberes Decoloniais”. 

Published

2020-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field. Guanambi College Law Journal, Guanambi, v. 6, n. 02, p. e269, 2020. DOI: 10.29293/rdfg.v6i02.269. Disponível em: https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922.. Acesso em: 18 may. 2024.