The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue

Abstract

This paper intend to demonstrate the apparent contradiction of Hegelian thought. Hegel's attempt is to unite with the substance of Spinoza and whit the “I free” of Kant, in other words, necessity and contingency. As we know this project is unfinished, and a modal operator, ie, a “must be” cosmic being weaker than the “must be” Kantian permeating the whole system, does not resolve this question.To reflect about this problematic leads us to the concept of ethical dialogue in Gadamer and you can take us toward an intersubjective ethical structure. Therefore, one must postulate such question “ab initio’ to justify the way of this argument, recognizing that this dimension of the human meeting, advocates the dialogue as a hermeneutical core of this ethical structure. In Gadamer there is an invitation to a recognition of what is at stake: the dialogue. On the horizon of hermeneutic perspective, the dialogue is in a praxis, a fundamentally ethical stance.