O que pode e deve ser dito sobre ciência no discurso da divulgação científica: nós precisamos da incerteza, é o único modo de continuar

Abstract

I am interested in the review of scientific materials, certain statements as "uncertainty," "incomplete," "imperfection", "provisional," "can’t ever be proven," "nothing exists unless you observe" and "we need uncertainty is the only way to keep "that embody certain sense about science. These seemingly conflicting directions to the functioning of a discourse of science and so conceived "as a screening activity between true statements and false statements" and as the production of a subject of science is that "the present absence" (Pêcheux, 1975: 97 - 98). I am interested, therefore, as proposed by Pecheux (1983), to achieve the objectivity of the interdiscourse contradictory material that determines the discourse of scientists, at present, looking on the one hand, understanding the historical conditions and ideological production which make possible the emergence these statements and, accordingly, these senses on science and on the other question about the role of scientific so how does the movement of knowledge production in a society like ours.