SUPERVISÃO ABUSIVA: UMA REVISÃO DA PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DOS ÚLTIMOS 20 ANOS

Autores

  • Davi Baasch UDESC - Santa Catarina State University
  • Simone Ghisi Feuerschütte UDESC - Santa Catarina State University
  • Jorge Braun Neto UDESC - Santa Catarina State University
  • Leandro Leite UDESC - Santa Catarina State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v13e320203-28

Palavras-chave:

Supervisão Abusiva, Liderança, Revisão Sistemática, Bullying.

Resumo

A supervisão abusiva (SA) expressa ações de liderança reconhecida como hostil. Este artigo aborda a SA em contextos organizacionais, partindo de uma revisão da produção científica nos últimos vinte anos. Foram analisados 67 trabalhos teórico-empíricos. Encontramos 8 periódicos especializados com publicações a partir de 2006, e 185 autores com pesquisas conduzidas em 83 países. Tepper (2000) foi a principal referência indicada. A fonte principal dos dados são os subordinados. O delineamento quantitativo foi unânime, apresentando diferentes técnicas de análise dos dados. Modelos teóricos e analíticos predominantes, antecedentes e consequências de SA mais evidenciadas nas pesquisas são discutidos.

Referências

AGARWAL, Upasna A. Examining links between abusive supervision, PsyCap, LMX and outcomes. [S.l: s.n.], Management Decision, v.57, 2019. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0103>.

AHMAD, Jawwad e colab. A Resource Perspective on Abusive Supervision and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Role of Subordinates’ Psychological Capital. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, v. 26, n. 1, p. 73–86, 2019. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818767391>.

ASHFORTH, Blake. Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, v.47, n. 7, p. 755–778, 1994. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700701>.

AVEY, James B. e WU, Keke e HOLLEY, Erica. The Influence of Abusive Supervision and Job Embeddedness on Citizenship and Deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 129, n. 3, p. 721–731, 2015. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2192-x>.

BAMBERGER, Peter A. e BACHARACH, Samuel B. Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, v. 59, n. 6, p. 723–752, 2006. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706066852>.

BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Modernidade Líquida. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 2001.

BREAUX, Denise M e colab. Time to Try a Little Tenderness? The Detrimental Effects of Accountability When Coupled With Abusive Supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, v. 15, n. 2, p. 111–122, 2008.

BREES, Jeremy e colab. The Mediating Role of Perceptions of Abusive Supervision in the Relationship Between Personality and Aggression. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, v. 21, n. 4, p. 403–413, 2014. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813505859>.

BREES, Jeremy e MARTINKO, Mark e HARVEY, Paul. Abusive supervision: subordinate personality or supervisor behavior? Journal of Managerial Psychology, v. 31, n. 2, p. 405–419, 2016. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2014-0129>.

BREEVAART, Kimberley e DE VRIES, Reinout E. Supervisor’s HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision. Leadership Quarterly, v. 28, n. 5, p. 691–700, 2017. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.001>.

BURTON, James P. e TAYLOR, Shannon G. e BARBER, Laris K. Understanding internal, external, and relational attributions for abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 35, p. 871–891, 2014. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1939>.

CAMPS, Jeroen e colab. Abusive Supervision as a Response to Follower Hostility: A Moderated Mediation Model. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-20, 2018. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4058-0>.

CAMPS, Jeroen e STOUTEN, Jeroen e EUWEMA, Martin. The Relation Between Supervisors’ Big Five Personality Traits and Employees’ Experiences of Abusive Supervision. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 7, n. February, p. 1–11, 2016. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00112>.

CARLSON, Dawn e colab. Abusive supervision and work-family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnout. Leadership Quarterly, v. 23, n. 5, p. 849–859, 2012. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.003>.

CHI, Shu Cheng Steve e LIANG, Shin Guang. When do subordinates’ emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates’ emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. Leadership Quarterly, v. 24, n. 1, p. 125–137, 2013. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.08.006>.

CROPANZANO, Russel e MITCHELL, Marie S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, v.31, n.6, p.874−900, December 2005. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602>.

DECOSTER, Stijn e colab. Standing by Your Organization: The Impact of Organizational Identification and Abusive Supervision on Followers’ Perceived Cohesion and Tendency to Gossip. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 118, n. 3, p. 623–634, 2013. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1612-z>.

DULEBOHN, James H. e colab. A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange: Integrating the Past With an Eye Toward the Future. Journal of Management, v.36, n.6, p. 1715–1759, 2012. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280>.

EINARSEN, Ståle e AASLAND, Merethe Schanke e SKOGSTAD, Anders. Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quarterly, v. 18, n. 3, p. 207–216, 1 Jun 2007.

EISSA, Gabi e LESTER, Scott W. Supervisor role overload and frustration as antecedents of abusive supervision: The moderating role of supervisor personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 38, n. 3, p. 307–326, 2017.

EISSA, Gabi e LESTER, Scott W. e GUPTA, Ritu. Interpersonal Deviance and Abusive Supervision: The Mediating Role of Supervisor Negative Emotions and the Moderating Role of Subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, p.1-18, 2019. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04130-x>.

ENRIQUEZ, Eugène. Prefácio. In Davel E e Vasconcelos J. (orgs.). “Recursos” humanos e subjetividade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1997.

FRIEDER, Rachel E. e HOCHWARTER, Wayne A. e DEORTENTIIS, Philip S. Attenuating the negative effects of abusive supervision: The role of proactive voice behavior and resource management ability. Leadership Quarterly, v. 26, n. 5, p. 821–837, 2015. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.001>.

GRAHAM, Katrina A. e colab. Too many cooks in the kitchen: The effects of dominance incompatibility on relationship conflict and subsequent abusive supervision. Leadership Quarterly, v. 30, n. December 2018, p. 351–364, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.12.003>.

GREGORY, Brian T. e colab. Abusive supervision and citizenship behaviors: Exploring boundary conditions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, v. 28, n. 6, p. 628–644, 2013. Diposnível em: <https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0314>.

HAGGARD, Dana L. e PARK, Hee Man. Perceived supervisor remorse, abusive supervision, and LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 39, n. 10, p. 1252–1267, 2018. Diposnível em: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2285>.

HAN, Guohong Helen e HARMS, P. D. e BAI, Yuntao. Nightmare Bosses: The Impact of Abusive Supervision on Employees’ Sleep, Emotions, and Creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 145, n. 1, p. 21–31, 2017. Diposnível em: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2859-y>.

HARRIS, Kenneth J. e KACMAR, K. Michele e ZIVNUSKA, Suzanne. An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. Leadership Quarterly, v. 18, n. 3, p. 252–263, 2007. Diposnível em: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.007>.

HARVEY, Paul e colab. Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, v. 18, n. 3, p. 264–280, 2007. Diposnível em: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.008>.

HEIFETZ, Ronald A. Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.

HENLE, Christine A. e GROSS, Michael A. What Have I Done to Deserve This? Effects of Employee Personality and Emotion on Abusive Supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 122, n. 3, p. 461–474, 2014. Diposnível em: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1771-6>.

HOBFOLL, Stevan E. Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, v. 44, n. 3, p. 513–524, Mar 1989. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513>.

HOOBLER, Jenny M. e HU, Jia. A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. Leadership Quarterly, v. 24, n. 1, p. 256–269, 2013. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.005>.

HURST, Charlice e colab. Are “Bad” Employees Happier Under Bad Bosses? Differing Effects of Abusive Supervision on Low and High Primary Psychopathy Employees. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1–16, 2017. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3770-5>.

JIANG, Wan e GU, Qinxuan. How abusive supervision and abusive supervisory climate influence salesperson creativity and sales team effectiveness in China. Management Decision, v. 54, n. 2, p. 455–475, 2016. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2015-0302>.

JU, Dong e colab. A Multilevel Study of Abusive Supervision, Norms, and Personal Control on Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, v. 26, n. 2, p. 163–178, 2019.

KARASEK, Robert A. Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 24, n. 2, p. 285-308, Jun 1979. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498>.

KERNAN, Mary C. e RACICOT, Bernadette M. e FISHER, Allan M. Effects of Abusive Supervision, Psychological Climate, and Felt Violation on Work Outcomes: A Moderated Mediated Model. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, v. 23, n. 3, p. 309–321, 2016. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815627358>.

KIEWITZ, Christian e colab. Sins of the parents: Self-control as a buffer between supervisors’ previous experience of family undermining and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision. Leadership Quarterly, v. 23, n. 5, p. 869–882, 2012. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.005>.

KIM, Kyoung Yong e colab. Three Motives for Abusive Supervision: The Mitigating Effect of Subordinates Attributed Motives on Abusive Supervision’s Negative Outcomes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818781816>.

KIM, Seckyoung Loretta e LEE, Soojin e YUN, Seokhwa. Abusive supervision, knowledge sharing, and individual factors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, v. 31, n. 6, p. 1106–1120, 2016. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-05-2015-0169>.

KLUEMPER, Donald H. e colab. When Core Self-Evaluations Influence Employees’ Deviant Reactions to Abusive Supervision: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Ability. Journal of Business Ethics, n. Chen 2012, p. 1–19, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3800-y>.

LAM, Catherine K. e WALTER, Frank e HUANG, Xu. Supervisors’ emotional exhaustion and abusive supervision: The moderating roles of perceived subordinate performance and supervisor self-monitoring. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 38, n. 8, p. 1151–1166, 2017. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2193>.

LEE, Soojin e KIM, Seckyoung Loretta e YUN, Seokhwa. A moderated mediation model of the relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing. Leadership Quarterly, v. 29, n. 3, p. 403–413, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.001>.

LEE, Soojin e YUN, Seokhwa e SRIVASTAVA, Abhishek. Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. Leadership Quarterly, v. 24, n. 5, p. 724–731, 2013. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.002>.

LIANG, Lindie H. e colab. Why is your boss making you sick? A longitudinal investigation modeling time-lagged relations between abusive supervision and employee physical health. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1050–1065, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2248>.

LIPMAN-BLUMEN, Jean. The allure of toxic leaders: Why we follow destructive bosses and corrupt politicians – And how we can survive them. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

LIU, Wenxing e colab. Abusive supervision and employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification. Management Decision, v. 54, n. 1, p. 130–147, 2016. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2013-0443>.

LOPES, Barbara C. e KAMAU, Caroline e JASPAL, Rusi. Coping With Perceived Abusive Supervision: The Role of Paranoia. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, v. 26, n. 2, p. 237–255, 2019. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818795821>.

MACKEY, Jeremy D. e colab. Victim and Culprit? The Effects of Entitlement and Felt Accountability on Perceptions of Abusive Supervision and Perpetration of Workplace Bullying. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 153, n. 3, p. 659–673, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3348-7>.

MACKEY, Jeremy D. e MCALLISTER, Charn P. e colab. Perceived organizational obstruction: A mediator that addresses source–target misalignment between abusive supervision and OCBs. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 39, n. 10, p. 1283–1295, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2293>.

MACKEY, Jeremy D. e colab. Subordinate social adaptability and the consequences of abusive supervision perceptions in two samples. Leadership Quarterly, v. 24, n. 5, p. 732–746, 2013. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.003>.

MACKEY, Jeremy D. e HUANG, Lei e HE, Wei. You Abuse and I Criticize: An Ego Depletion and Leader–Member Exchange Examination of Abusive Supervision and Destructive Voice. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-13, 2018. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4024-x>.

MARTINKO, Mark J. e colab. Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. Leadership Quarterly, v. 22, n. 4, p. 751–764, 2011. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.013>. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.013>.

MAWRITZ, Mary B. e FOLGER, Robert e LATHAM, Gary P. Supervisors’ exceedingly difficult goals and abusive supervision: The mediating effects of hindrance stress, anger, and anxiety. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 35, p. 358–372, 2014. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1879>.

MCALLISTER, Charn P. e MACKEY, Jeremy D. e PERREWÉ, Pamela L. The role of self-regulation in the relationship between abusive supervision and job tension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 39, n. 4, p. 416–428, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2240>

MINTZBERG, Henry. Managing: desvendando o dia a dia da gestão. Porto Alegre, Bookman, 2010.

MINTZBERG, Henry. Managing Essencial. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2014.

MITCHELL, Marie S. e AMBROSE, Maureen L. Abusive Supervision and Workplace Deviance and the Moderating Effects of Negative Reciprocity Beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1159–1168, Jul 2007. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159>.

NORTHOUSE, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and Practice. 7 ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2016.

OGUNFOWORA, Babatunde. When the abuse is unevenly distributed: The effects of abusive supervision variability on work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 34, p. 1105–1123, 2013. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1841>.

PADILLA, Art e HOGAN, Robert e KAISER, Robert B. The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. Leadership Quarterly, v. 18, n. 3, p. 176–194, 1 Jun 2007. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001>.

PALANSKI, Michael e AVEY, James B. e JIRAPORN, Napatsorn. The Effects of Ethical Leadership and Abusive Supervision on Job Search Behaviors in the Turnover Process. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 121, n. 1, p. 135–146, 2014. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1690-6>.

PAN, Su Ying e LIN, Katrina Jia. Who Suffers When Supervisors are Unhappy? The Roles of Leader–Member Exchange and Abusive Supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 151, n. 3, p. 799–811, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3247-y>.

PARK, Joon Hyung e colab. Abusive Supervision, Psychological Distress, and Silence: The Effects of Gender Dissimilarity Between Supervisors and Subordinates. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 153, n. 3, p. 775–792, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3384-3>.

ROBERTSON, Jennifer L. e DIONISI, Angela M. e BARLING, Julian. Linking attachment theory to abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Psychology, v. 33, n. 2, p. 214–228, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2017-0399>.

ROUSSEAU, Vincent e AUBÉ, Caroline. When Leaders Stifle Innovation in Work Teams: The Role of Abusive Supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 151, n. 3, p. 651–664, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3258-8>.

SCHYNS, Birgit e FELFE, Jörg e SCHILLING, Jan. Is It Me or You?—How Reactions to Abusive Supervision Are Shaped by Leader Behavior and Follower Perceptions. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 9, n. July, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01309>.

SHAO, Ping e LI, Andrew e MAWRITZ, Mary. Self-protective reactions to peer abusive supervision: The moderating role of prevention focus and the mediating role of performance instrumentality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 39, n. 1, p. 12–25, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2206>.

SHAO, Ping e RESICK, Christian J. e HARGIS, Michael B. Helping and harming others in the workplace: The roles of personal values and abusive supervision. Human Relations, v. 64, n. 8, p. 1051–1078, 2011. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711399940>.

TAJFEL, Henri e TURNER, John C. J. The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In Worchel, Stephen e Austin, William G. (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (p. 7 – 24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 1986.

TEPPER, Bennett J. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, v. 43, n. 2, p. 178–190, 2000. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375>.

TEPPER, Bennett J. Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, v. 33, n. 3, p. 261–289, 30 Jun 2007. Retrieved from: <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206307300812>.

VOGEL, Ryan M. e colab. A cross-cultural examination of subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 36, p. 720–745, 2015. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1984>.

WANG, Gang e HARMS, Peter D. e MACKEY, Jeremy D. Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 131, n. 2, p. 487–503, 2015. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2292-7>.

WATKINS, Trevor e FEHR, Ryan e HE, Wei. Whatever it takes: Leaders’ perceptions of abusive supervision instrumentality. Leadership Quarterly, v. 30, n. 2, p. 260–272, 2019. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.002>.

WHITMAN, Marilyn V. e HALBESLEBEN, Jonathon R. B. e HOLMES IV, Oscar. Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 30, n. September 2014, p. 839–862, 2009. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1852>.

WU, Long Zeng e colab. Work-to-family spillover effects of abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Psychology, v. 27, n. 7, p. 714–731, 2012. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211259539>.

WU, Wei Li e LEE, Yi Chih. Do employees share knowledge when encountering abusive supervision? Journal of Managerial Psychology, v. 31, n. 1, p. 154–168, 2016. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2013-0410>.

XU, Erica e colab. Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 33, p. 531–543, 2012. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1002/job.768>.

XU, Qin e ZHANG, Guangxi e CHAN, Andrew. Abusive Supervision and Subordinate Proactive Behavior: Joint Moderating Roles of Organizational Identification and Positive Affectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 157, n. 3, p. 829–843, 2019. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3691-3>.

YUAN, Xiao e XU, Yaoshan e LI, Yongjuan. Resource Depletion Perspective on the Link Between Abusive Supervision and Safety Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-16, 2018. Retrieved from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3983-2>.

ZHAO, Chen e GAO, Zhonghua e LIU, Yonghong. Worse-off than others? Abusive supervision’s effects in teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, v. 33, n. 6, p. 418–436, 2018. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2017-0476>.

ZHENG, Xiaoming e LIU, Xin. The buffering effect of mindfulness on abusive supervision and creative performance: A social cognitive framework. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 8, n. SEP, p. 1–12, 2017. Retrieved from: <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01588>.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-01-22

Edição

v. 13 n. 3 (2020)

Seção

Artigos Científicos

Licença

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;

O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);

A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);

É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html