Does the activation of root canal dressings improve their filling quality on teeth with simulated internal root resorption?

Authors

  • Gabriel Barcelos Só UFRGS
  • Larissa Basso Arpini
  • Leonardo Thomasi Jahnke
  • Wesley Misael Krabbe
  • Natália Backa Abrahão
  • Lucas Siqueira Pinheiro
  • Marcus Vinícius Reis Só
  • Ricardo Abreu da Rosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59306/jrd.v11e1202314-19

Keywords:

root canal dressing, passive ultrasonic irrigation, easy clean, xp endo finisher, calcium hydroxide, bioceramic

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate, by micro-computed tomography, the filling capacity of two root canal dressings (RCD) - Bio-C Temp and Ultracal - after different activation protocols in teeth with simulated internal root resorption. Eighty single-rooted bovine teeth were sectioned in the cervical portion, standardizing the roots at 16 mm. Then, the canals were prepared by the apex-crown technique until instrument #80 using 2mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution at each instrument change. Afterward, the roots were sectioned longitudinally, and internal root resorptions were simulated using a diamond bur 1016 at 5 mm from the root apex. Hemiroots were joined and fixed with cyanoacrylate, scanned in micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to assess total canal volume and simulated internal resorption, and then divided by stratified randomization into experimental groups according to RCD and method of activation (n = 10): Ultracal/Syringe; Ultracal/PUI, Ultracal/XP Endo Finisher, Ultracal Easy Clean, Bio-C Temp/Syringe, Bio-C Temp/PUI, Bio-C Temp/XP Endo Finisher and Bio-C/Easy Clean. Another scanning was performed to assess the volume of voids after RCD activation methods. The ANOVA and Tukey tests compared the activation methods. Student's T-test compared the RCDs within each activation method. Initial root canal volume values were similar for all groups (P > 0.05). There was no difference between activation protocols (P > 0.05). Higher volumes of void spaces were observed for Bio-C Temp compared to Ultracal after all activation methods (P < 0.05), except for Easy Clean (P > 0.05). Due to this, it can be concluded that the agitation methods tested for the Bio-C Temp and Ultracal pastes did not improve the filling of bovine teeth with simulated internal root resorption.

 

Downloads

Published

2023-05-03

Issue

Section

Articles