IDEAS SELECTION CRITERIA IN THE INNOVATION FRONT END

Authors

  • Aline Valdati UFSC
  • João Artur de Souza
  • Gertrudes Aparecida Dandolini

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v12e12019205-229

Keywords:

Ideas selection, Innovation Front End, Idea Management, Criteria for Ideas Selection.

Abstract

Appropriate criteria for selecting ideas increase the chances of organizations to develop potentially innovative and competitive products. The purpose of this paper is to identify criteria for selecting ideas in the context of innovation. For this, an integrative literature review was conducted. The result identified the division of the criteria into 5 aspects. The Technical and Technological aspect encompasses the technical viability, infrastructure and intellectual capital. Economical addresses the market, customer acceptance and finance. The Strategic aspect involves strategic fit. The Social aspect considers the culture and context. Finally, Intuition is considered when choosing ideas in the early stages of innovation.

Author Biographies

  • Aline Valdati, UFSC

    Doutoranda e Mestre em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
    Endereço: UFSC, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Trindade, CEP: 88040-900. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.

    Telefone: (48) 3721-2450
    E-mail: [email protected]

  • João Artur de Souza

    Doutor em Engenharia de Produção pela UFSC

    Professor do departamento de Engenharia do Conhecimento na UFSC
    Endereço: UFSC, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Trindade, CEP: 88040-900. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.

    Telefone: (48) 3721-2450
    E-mail: [email protected]

  • Gertrudes Aparecida Dandolini

    Doutora em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

    Professora do departamento de Engenharia do Conhecimento na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
    Endereço: UFSC, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Trindade, CEP: 88040-900. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.

    Telefone: (48) 3721-2450
    E-mail: [email protected]

References

BLOHM, I; RIEDL, C; LEIMEISTER, J M, KRCMAR, H. Idea evaluation mechanisms for collective intelligence in open innovation communities: Do traders outperform. International Conference On Information System. Shanghai, p. 3059-3082. 2011.

BOTHOS, E; APOSTOLOU, D; MENTZAS, G. Idea selection and Information Aggregation Markets. Iemc-europe 2008 Ieee International Engineering Management Conference, Europe: Managing Engineering, Technology And Innovation For Growth. Estori, 2008.

BRUN, E.; SAETRE; A. S. E GJELSVIK; M. Classification of ambibuity in new product development projects. European Journal of Innovation, 12, 1, 62- 85, 2009.

BUYUKOZKAN, G.; FEYZIOGLU, O. A new approach based on soft computing to accelerate the selection of new product ideas. Computers In Industry. 10.1016/j.compind.2003.09.007, p. 151-167. jun. 2004

CHAN, S. L.; IP, W.; H., KWONG, C. K., Closing the loop between design and market for new product idea screening decisions, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 7729-7737, 2011.

CHANG, S. L; CHEN, C. Y.; WEY, S. C. (feb. 2008) Conceptualizing, assessing, and managing front-end fuzziness in innovation/NPD projects. R&d Management. Malden, p. 469-478.

COOPER, R. G. Predevelopment activities determine new product success. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 17, n. 3, p. 237-247, 1988.

FERIOLI, M.; ROUSSEL, B.; RENAUD, J.; TRUCHOT, P. Evaluation of the potential performance of innovative concepts in the early stages of the new-product development process (npdp). International Design Conference. [s.l.], p. 1139-1148, 2008.

FERIOLI, M. et al. Understanding the rapid evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of design. International Journal of Product Development, v. 12, n. 1, p. 67-83, 2010. ISSN 1477-9056.

GABRIEL, A.; CAMARGO, M.; MONTICOLO, D.; BOLY, V.; BOURGAULT, M. Improving the idea selection process in creative workshops through contextualization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.039.

GIROTRA, K.; TERWIESCH, C.; ULRICH, K T. Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea. Management Science. [s.l.], p. 591-605. abr. 2010.

GÖRS, J.; HORTON, G; KEMPE, N. A collaborative algorithm for computer-supported idea selection in the front end of innovation. Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences, HICSS 2011. Maui, Hi, p. 217-226.

HAMMEDI, W.; A. VAN RIEL, C. R.; SASOVOVA, Z. Antecedents and Consequences of Reflexivity in New Product Idea Screening, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp.662-679, 2011.

HORTON, G.; GOERS, J. Mining Hidden Profiles in the Collaborative Evaluation of Raw Ideas. System Sciences (HICSS), 2014.

HORTON, G.; GÖRS, J. A. Criterion-Mining Method for Group Idea Selection – Increasing Consensus with Minimal Loss of Efficiency. Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences. Hawaii, 2015, p. 336-343

HORTON, G.; GÖRS, J. How Not to Select Ideas for Innovations: A Critique of the Scoring Method. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 49), Hawaii, January 2016.

VAGN, A. R., CLAUSEN, C., & GISH, L. Towards a new perspective of managing ideas in front-end innovation as actor networks. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13): Design For Harmonies (pp. 181-190). Design Society, 2013.

KAHRAMAN, C.; BUYUKOZKAN, G.; ATES, Nufer y. A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences. 10.1016/j.ins. 2006.09.008, p. 1567-1582. 1. Jan, 2007.

KEMPE, N. et al. An Optimal Algorithm for Raw Idea Selection under Uncertainty. System Science (HICSS), 2011 45th Hawaii International Conference, 2012, 4-7, p.237-246.

KLEIN, M.; GARCIA, A. C. B. High-speed idea filtering with the bag of lemons. Decision Support Systems. jun. 2015. [s.l.], p. 39-50. 30.

KOEN, P. A. et al. Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end”. Research Technology Management, Arlington, v. 44, n. 2, p. 46-55, 2001.

KOEN, P. A.; BERTELS, H. M.J.; KLEINSCHMIDT, E. J. Managing the Front End of Innovation-Part II: Results from a Three-Year Study: Effective Front-End activities were found to be significantly different for incremental and radical projects. Research-Technology Management, v. 57, n.3, p. 25-35, 2014.

KOTLER, P; KELLER, K. L. Administração de Marketing. 12. ed. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice-Hall. 2006.

LI, F. YANG, Y., XIE, J., ZHAO, X., MA, J., LI, Y. A Dynamic and Fuzzy Modeling Approach for Multi-attribute New Product Idea Screening and Portfolio. International Journal Of Advancements In Computing Technology (IJACT). 10.4156/ijact.vol4.issue1.11, p. 96-103. LO, C. C. jan. 2012.

MAGNUSSON, P. R. Exploring the contributions of involving ordinary users in ideation of technology-based services. 2009.

MAGNUSSON, P; NETZ, J; WÄSTLUND, E. Exploring holistic intuitive idea screening in the light of formal criteria. Technovation. Elsevier, p. 315-326. 18 abr. 2014.

MAGNUSSON, P; WÄSTLUND, E; NETZ, J. Exploring Users’ Appropriateness as a Proxy for Experts When Screening New Product/Service Ideas. Product Development & Management Association. 2016, [s.l.], p. 4-18.

MOUSAVI, M S; TORABI, A S; TAVAKKOLI-MOGHADDAM, R. A Hierarchical Group Decision-Making Approach for New Product Selection in a Fuzzy Environment. Arabian Journal For Science And Engineering. jan. 2013 [s.l.], p. 3233-3248.

ONARHEIM, B; CHRISTENSEN, B. Distributed idea screening in stage–gate development processes. Journal Of Engineering Design. Columbia, set. 2012, p. 660-663. 23.

PERRY-SMITH, J; COFF, R.W. Navigating a Darwinian process of entrepreneurial creativity: How optimal group mood differs for generating and selecting creative business ideas. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2011, 5(3):p. 247-268.

PILLER, F. T.; WALCHER, D. Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&d Management. Malden, 2006, p. 307-319.

RIEDL, C; BLOHM, I; LEIMEISTER, J M; KRCMAR, H. Rating scales for collective intelligence in innovation communities: why quick and easy decision making does not get it right. International Conference On Information Systems. St Louis, 2010, p. 1-21.

RIETZSCHEL, E.F., NIJSTAD, B.A., STROEBE, W. The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 2010, 101 (1), p. 47-68.

RIETZSCHEL, E.F., NIJSTAD, B.A., STROEBE, W. Productivity is not enough: a comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2006, 42 (2), p. 244-251

SOUZA, Marcela Tavares de; SILVA, MICHELLY Dias da; CARVALHO, Rachel de. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein (São Paulo), v. 8, n. 1, p. 102-106, 2010.

SOUKHOROUKOVA, A.; SPANN, M.; & SKIERA, B. Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets. Product Development & Management Association. 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00881.

SMITH, P. G.; REINERTSEN, D. G. Developing products in half the time. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.

STEVANOVIĆ, M; MARJANOVIĆ, D; Ŀ. TORGA, M. Decision support system for idea selection. International Design Conference - Design 2012. Dubrovnik, mai. 2012, p. 1951-1960.

TIDD, J.; BESSANT, J.; PAVITT, K. Gestão da Inovação. 5. Ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2015.

TOUBIA, O; FLORES, L. Adaptative Idea Screening Using Consumers. Marketing Science. [s.l.], jun. 2007, p. 342-360.

TRAVESSINI, R; RODRIGUES, T; BRAGHINI, A Jr. COLMENERO, J. C. BEINLICH, S. ZOCCHE, L. Selection of ideas in the furniture industry with the help of the method Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Espacios. [s.l.], set. 2015, p. 2-15.

VALDATI, A. B. Processo de seleção de ideias em empresas inovadoras. Dissertação (mestrado) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro Tecnológico. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Florianópolis, SC, 2017. 216p.

VAN RIEL, A C.R; Semeijn, J; Hammedi, W; Henseler, J. Technology-based service proposal screening and decision-making effectiveness. Management Decision. [s.l.], 2011, p. 762-783.

XIE, L.; ZHANG, P. A three phase idea selection approach for team creation. International Seminar On Business And Information Management, Isbim 2008. Wuhan, 2009, p. 326-329.

XU, Y; WAN, X. Research on Screening Model of Large High-tech Enterprises Product Innovation Idea. Conf. On Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing. [s.l.], 2014, p. 442-448.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-22

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Artigos Científicos

License

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;

O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);

A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);

É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html