CONTEINERIZAÇÃO E PORTO: Panorama e tendência da produção científica

Autores

  • Wagner Antônio Coelho Universidade do Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI)
  • Charles Rodrigues Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).
  • Luiz Eduardo Simão Universidade do Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI)
  • Angel Freddy Godoy Viera Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v11e0I201829-60

Palavras-chave:

Conteinerização e porto – produção científica, Conteinerização e porto – áreas de pesquisa, Conteinerização e porto – tendências de pesquisas

Resumo

Apresenta um panorama da produção científica e aponta tendências presentes na literatura sobre conteinerização e porto no período de 1997 a 2016. Como métodos, definiu-se: a Web of Science como base para coleta de dados e a utilização do software CiteSpace para processamento de dados. Os resultados demonstram: a produção científica mundial, nos últimos dez anos, triplicou, e o Brasil acompanhou esse crescimento, apesar de uma participação ainda incipiente no cenário internacional. Também, apresentam-se as publicações que mais produziram sobre o tema, os autores mais produtivos e mais citados, as referências mais citadas e os temas emergentes.

Biografia do Autor

Wagner Antônio Coelho, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI)

Mestrando do Programa de Mestrado Profissionalizante em Administração - Gestão, Internacionalização e Logística (PMPGIL) da UNIVALI. Professor da UNIVALI.

Charles Rodrigues, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

Doutorando em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Bibliotecário da Prefeitura de Itajaí/SC.

Luiz Eduardo Simão, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI)

Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Professor do Programa de Mestrado Profissionalizante em Administração - Gestão, Internacionalização e Logística (PMPGIL) da UNIVALI.

Angel Freddy Godoy Viera, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

Referências

ALPHALINER. Alphalinermonthly monitor. 2016. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.alphaliner.com/resources/Alphaliner_Monthly_Monitor.pdf>.

ASTERIS, M; COLLINS, A. UK container port investment and competition: impediments to the Market. Transport Reviews, v. 30, n. 2, p. 163-178, 2010.

BIERWIRTH, C.; MEISEL, F. A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research, v. 202, n. 3, p. 615-627, 2010.

BOTTER, R. C.; BRINATI, M. A. Stowage container planning: a model for getting an optimal solution. In: Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on computer applications in the automation of shipyard operation and ship design, p. 217 – 229, 1992.

BRAEKERS, K.; CARIS, A.; JANSSENS, G. K. Determining optimal shipping routes for barge transport with empty container repositioning. Proceedings of theEuropean Simulation and Modelling Conference, p. 338-344, 2010.

CABRAL, A. M. R.; RAMOS, F. S. Cluster analysis of the competitiveness of container ports in Brazil. Transportation Research Part A, v. 69,p. 423–43, 2014.

CHEN, C. How to use CiteSpace. Disponível em: <http://rita.ufsc.br:8080/rita/tutoriais/manual-do-citespace-em-portuguesbrasileiro/at_download/file>. Acesso em 08 nov. 2016.

CHEONG, C. et al. Multi-objective and prioritized berth allocation in container ports. Annals of Operations Research, v. 180, n. 1, p. 63-103, 2010.

CULLINANE, K. et al. An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Review of network Economics, v. 3, n. 2, 2004.

CULLINANE, K; WILMSMEIER, G. The contribution of the dry port concept to the extension of port life cycles. Handbook of terminal planning, p. 359-379, 2011.

DUCRUET, C.; LEE, S. W.; NG, A. K. Y. Centrality and vulnerability in liner shipping networks: revisiting the Northeast Asian port hierarchy. Maritime Policy & Management, v. 37, n. 1, p. 17-36, 2010.

DUCRUET C.; NOTTEBOOM T. E. The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: Spatial structure and regional dynamics. Global Network, v. 12, p. 395–423, 2012.

ELSEVIER. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.journals.elsevier.com/transportation-research-part-elogistics-and-transportation-review>. Acesso em: 09 fev. 2017.

GUERRERO, D.; RODRIGUE, J. P. The Waves of containerization: Shifts in global maritime Transportation. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 34, p. 151-164. 2014.

HARTMANN, S. A general framework for scheduling equipment and manpower at container terminals. Operations Research Spectrum, v. 26, n. 1, p. 51-74, 2004.

HARTMANN, S. Generating scenarios for simulation and optimization of container terminal logistics. Operations Research Spectrum, v. 26, n. 2, p. 171-192, 2004.

HE, J. et al. A hybrid parallel genetic algorithm for yard crane scheduling. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, v. 46, n. 1, p. 136–155, 2010.

HONGCHUN W. et al. Dynamic and quantitative CiteSpace: analysis of chinese sports discipline in the past decade. Advances in Physical Education, v. 6, p. 135-143, 2016.

HOU, J. H. Visualizing Analysis of the Evolution of Business Administration Discipline and Hot-Spot. Dalian: Dalian Technology University, 2009.

IMAI, A. et al. Berth allocation in a container port: using a continuous location space approach. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological, v. 39, n.3, p. 199-221, 2005.

INDERSCIENCE. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics. 2017. Disponível em: <http://www.inderscience.com/jhome.php?jcode=ijstl#moredesc>. Acesso em: 09 fev. 2017.

KIA, M.; SHAYAN, E; GHOTB, F. Positive impact of distribution centres on the environment. Transport Reviews, v. 23, n. 1, p. 105-122, 2003.

KIM, K. H.; PARK, Y-M. A crane scheduling method for port container terminals. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 156, n. 3, p. 752-768, 2004.

LEE, D. H.; CHEN, J. H; CAO, J. X. The continuous berth allocation problem: a greedy randomized adaptive search solution. Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review, v. 46, n. 6, p. 1017-1029, p. 2010.

LEE, C.Y., SONG, D. Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities.Transportation Research Part B, v. 95, p. 442-474, 2017.

LEE, D. H.; WANG, H. Q. Integrated discrete berth allocation and quay crane scheduling in port container terminals. Journal Engineering Optimization, v. 42, n. 8, p. 747-761, 2010.

LEE, D. H; WANG, H. Q. Quay crane scheduling with non-interference constraints in port container terminals. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, v. 44, n. 1, p. 124-135, 2008.

LEVINSON, Marc. The box: how the shipping container made the world smaller and the world economy bigger. Editora Princeton University Press. Princeton. EstadosUnidos da América. 2006.

LEWIS, B.; ARERA, A.; WHITE, C. Optimization approaches for efficient container security operations at transshipment seaports. Transportation Security and Infrastructure Protection: Safety and Human Performance, v. 1822, p. 1-8, 2003.

MACIAS-CHAPULA, C. A. O papel da informetria. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 27, n. 2, 1998.

MALONI, M.; JACKSON, E. C. Nort American container port capacity: an exploratory analysis.Transportation Jornal, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1-22, 2005.

MARIT POLICY MANAG. Aims and scope. 2017. Disponível em: <http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=tmp m20>. Acesso em: 09 fev. 2017.

MEISEL, F.; BIERWIRTH, C. Heuristics for the integration of crane productivity in the berth allocation problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 196-209, 2009.

NASSI-CALÒ, L. Estudo propõe uma taxonomia de razões para citar artigos em publicações científicas. SciELO em Perspectiva, 2014. Disponível em: http://blog.scielo.org/blog/2014/11/07/estudo-propoe-uma-taxonomia-de-razoes-para-citarartigos-em-publicacoes-cientificas. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2017.

NORONHA, D. P.; MARICATO, J. M. Estudos métricos da informação: primeiras aproximações. EncontrosBibli, Florianópolis, n. esp., p. 116-128, 2008.

NOTTEBOOM, T. Container shipping and ports: an overview. Review of Network Economics. [S.I.], n. 3, p. 86-106, 2004.

NOTTEBOOM, T. From multi-porting to a hub port configuration: the South African container port system in transition. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics (IJSTL), v. 2, n. 2, p. 224-245, 2010.

NOTTEBOOM, T.; RODRIGUE, J. P. Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management, v. 32, n. 3, p. 297-313, 2005.

NOTTEBOOM, T.; RODRIGUE, J. P. Re-assessing port-hinterland relationships in the context of global commodity chains. In: WANG, J. et al. (Ed.). Ports, cities, and global supply chain. Ashgate. p. 51-66. 2007.

PINTO, A. L.; GONZALES-AGUILAR, A. Visibilidad de losestudiosenanálisis de redes socialesen América delSur: suevolución y métricas de 1990-2013. TransInformação, Campinas, v. 26, n.3, p. 253-267, set./dez., 2014.

RODRIGUE, J. P.; NOTTEBOOM, T. The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy and Management, v. 36, n. 2, p. 165-183, 2009.

RODRIGUE J. P. et al. Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics.Journal of Transport Geography, v. 18, n. 4, p. 519-529, 2010.

RODRIGUES C.; GODOY VIERA, A. F. Estudos bibliométricos sobre a produção científica da temática Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação em bibliotecas. InCID: R. Ci. Inf. e Doc., Ribeirão Preto, v. 7, n. 1, p. 167-180, mar./ago. 2016.

SANCHO, R. Indicadores bibliométricos utilizados enlaevaluación de laciencia y latecnología. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, v. 13, n. 3-4, p. 842-865, 1990.

SANTOS, R. N. M. Indicadores estratégicos em ciência e tecnologia: refletindo a sua prática como dispositivo de inclusão/exclusão. TransInformação, Campinas, v. 15 (ed. esp.), p. 129- 140, set./dez. 2003.

SONG, D. P.; DONG, J. X. Cargo routing and empty container repositioning in multiple shipping service routes, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, v. 46, n. 10, p. 1556-1575, 2012.

SPRINGER. MaritimeEconomics&Logistics. 2017. Disponível em: <http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/journal/41278/PS2?detailsPage=edito rialBoard>. Acesso em: 09 fev. 2017.

STAHLBOCK, R.; VOß, S. Operations research at container terminals: a literature update. OR Spectrum, v. 30, n .1, p. 1–52, 2008.

STEENKEN D.; VOΒ, S.; STAHLBOCK, R. Container terminal operation and operations Research - a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum, v.26, n. 1, p. 3-49, 2004.

TONGZON, J.; HENG, W. Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, v. 39, n. 5, p. 405-424, 2005.

TRR. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2017. Disponível em: <http://trrjournalonline.trb.org/loi/trr>. Acesso em: 09 fev. 2017.

TULPULE, M. et al. Modeling the empty container flow: An application of system dynamics. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Harbour Maritime and Multimodal Logistics Modeling & Simulation, v. 1, p. 15-23, 2010.

TURNER S.; OLIVER, G. B. M. Container traffic as it affects layout and operation of ports. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers,v. 37, n. 2, p. 423 – 426, 1967.

VIS, I. F. A.; DE KOSTER, R. Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: an overview. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research, v. 147, n. 1, p. 1-16, 2003.

WANG, S.; MENG, Q. Liner ship route schedule design with sea contingency time and port time uncertainty. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, v. 46, n. 5, p. 615-633, 2012.

WANG, S.; MENG, Q. Robust schedule design for liner shipping services. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, v. 48, n. 6, p. 1093-1106, 2012.

WORLD SHIPPING COUNCIL (WSC). Global Container Fleet. Disponível em: < http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/containers/global-container-fleet>. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2017.

WEI, F.; GRUBESIC, T. H.; BISHOP, B. W. Exploring the GIS Knowledge Domain Using CiteSpace. The Professional Geographer, v. 67, n. 3, p. 374-384, 2015.

WEB OF SCIENCE (WOS). Intelligent results, brilliant connections. 2016. Disponívelem: <http://ipscience.thomsonreuters.com/product/web-ofscience/?utm_source=false&utm_medium=false&utm_campaign=false>. Acesso em: 08 nov. 2016.

WILSON, I. D.; ROACH, P. A. Container stowage planning: a methodology for generating computerised solutions. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 51, n. 11, p. 1248-1255, 2000.

ZHANG, C. et al. The allocation of berths and quay cranes by using a sub-gradient optimization technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, v. 58, n. 1, p. 40-50, 2010.

Downloads

Publicado

2018-10-09

Edição

Seção

Artigos Científicos