O USO DA TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO NA INOVAÇÃO DOS SISTEMAS LOGÍSTICOS PORTUÁRIOS

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v14eI2021110-133

Palavras-chave:

Internet física, sistemas comunitários portuários, melhores práticas.

Resumo

As características dos Port Community Systems (PCS) afetam como a colaboração entre os players pode ser estabelecida na comunidade portuária. A digitalização feita em terminais no âmbito dos PCS tem fomentado o desenvolvimento da colaboração horizontal na comunidade portuária. O acesso a dados e informações relevantes cria oportunidades para novos modelos de negócios para a comunidade portuária. Através da análise realizada neste estudo, concluímos que a implementação de uma Internet Física pode levar décadas, mas a mudança nos serviços prestados pelo PCS está configurando uma mudança de mentalidade de Cadeias de Abastecimento Isoladas para Cadeias de Abastecimento Abertas, promovendo a Internet Física.

Biografia do Autor

  • Vítor Caldeirinha
    Centro de Investigação em Ciências Empresariais, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal (CICE-IPS), Portugal

Referências

AYDOGDU, Y.V., AKSOY, S. (2015). A study on quantitative benefits of port community systems. Maritime Policy and Management, 42 (1), pp.1-10.

BICHOU, K., GRAY, R.A. (2005). A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol.39(1), pp.75-92.

BOWERSOX, D.J., GLOSS, D.J. (2001). Logística empresarial: o processo de integração da cadeia de suprimento. São Paulo: Atlas.

CALDERINHA, V., FELÍCIO, A., SALVADOR, A., NABAIS, J. and PINHO, T. (2020). The impact of port community systems (PCS) characteristics on performance. Research in Transportation Economics, 80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100818.

CARLAN, V., CHRISTA, S., CALATAYUD, A. & VANELSLANDER, T. (2018). Digital Innovation in Maritime Supply Chains, IDB.

CARLAN, V., CHRISTA, S., VANELSLANDER, T. (2016). Port Community Systems costs and benefits: From competition to collaboration within the supply chain. Helenic Institute of Transport.

CHANDRA, D.R., Van HILLEGERSBERG, J. (2017). Governance lifecycles of inter-organizational collaboration: A case study of the port of Rotterdam. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 656–663.

CORDOVA, F., DURAN, C. (2012). Conceptual analysis for the strategic and operational knowledge management of a port community. Informatica Economica, 16, 35-44.

De LANGEN, P.W., VAN DER LUGT, L.M. (2017). Institutional reforms of port authorities in the Netherlands: The establishment of port development companies. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 22, 108–113.

HENESEY E.L., NOTTEBOOM, E.T., & DAVIDSON, P. (2003). Agent-based simulation of stakeholders relations: An approach to sustainable port terminal management. International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference. Busan, Korea.

IRANNEZHAD, E., HICKMAN, M. & PRATO, C. (2017). Modeling the efficiency of a port community system as an agent-based process. Procedia Computer Science, 109C 917–922.

KARAKOSTAS, B. (2019). Modelling and Simulation of a Physical Internet of Transportation Hubs. Procedia Computer Science, vol.151, pp.17-22.

MARTIN, J., THOMAS, B.J., (2001). The container terminal community. Maritime Policy & Management, 28 (3), 279-292.

MONTREUIL, B. (2011). Toward a Physical Internet: Meeting the Global Logistics Sustainability Grand Challenge. Logistics Research, vol.3, pp.71-87.

PAN, S. (2019). Opportunities of Product-Service System in Physical Internet. Procedia CIRP 83, pp.473-478.

RADHIKA, D. (2012). The new role of seaports as integral parts of global supply chains. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies, 2 (4), 131-144.

RODON, J. RAMIS-PUJOL, J., (2006). Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a port community system. 19th Bled eConference eValues, Bled, Slovenia.

SIMMER, L., PFOSER, S., GRABNER, M., SCHAUER, O., PUTZ, L.M. (2017). From Horizontal Collaboration to the Physical Internet – A Case Study from Austria. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration. Vol.1, pp.129-136

SWEENEY, E., EVANGELISTA, P. (2005). Supply chain learning needs: Towards a port community perspective. Journal of Maritime and Transportation Sciences, 42 (1), 93-108.

TIJAN, E., AGATIĆ, A., HLAČA, B. (2012). The necessity of port community system implementation in the Croatian seaports. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 24 (4), 305-315.

VENKATADRI, U., KRISHNA, K.S., ULKU, M.A. (2016). On the Physical Internet Logistics: Modeling the Impact of Consolidation on Transportation and Inventory Costs. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol.13(4), pp.1517-1527.

VICKERY, S.K., JAYARAM, J., DROGE, C. CALANTONE, R. (2003). The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: An analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 523–539.

WANG, J., OLIVIER, D., NOTTEBOOM, T., SLACK, B. (eds.), (2007). Ports, cities, and global supply chains. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

YANG, Y., PAN, S., BALLOT, E. (2017). Innovative Vendor Managed Inventory Strategy Exploiting Interconnected Logistics Services in The Physical Internet. International Journal of Production Research, vol.55, pp.2685-2702.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-05-27

Edição

Seção

Artigos Científicos