A INFLUÊNCIA DOS EXECUTIVOS NO DESEMPENHO ORGANIZACIONAL: UM ESTUDO BIBLIOMÉTRICO

Autores

  • Julio Cesar Volpp Sierra UNINOVE
  • Fernando Antonio Ribeiro Serra UNINOVE
  • Luiz Antonio de Carvalho Guerrazzi UNINOVE
  • Maria Candida Sotelino Torres

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v12e1201950-69

Palavras-chave:

Executivos do desempenho Organizacional, Estudo bibliométrico e sociométrico, Managerial Discretion.

Resumo

Há 80 anos, a academia busca compreender assertivamente o papel dos executivos nas organizações. Pesquisadores intencionaram responder a esse problema e produziram artigos. Desta feita, este estudo objetiva identificar a magnitude da produção acadêmica internacional acerca do impacto dos executivos sobre o desempenho organizacional, por meio de estudo bilibométrico. Valendo-se das leis da Bilbiometria, identificou a atualidade do tema, com produção anual ascendente, em periódicos de alto fator de impacto: Strategic Management Journal,Academy of Management Journal eJournal of Management. Donald Hambrick emerge como grande autor seminal, inclusive para o construto managerial discretion. O presente estudo aponta duas possibilidades de estudos futuros.

Biografia do Autor

  • Julio Cesar Volpp Sierra, UNINOVE
    Mestre em Administração - UNINOVE
  • Fernando Antonio Ribeiro Serra, UNINOVE
    Doutor em Administração
  • Luiz Antonio de Carvalho Guerrazzi, UNINOVE
    Doutor em Administração

Referências

ACEDO, F., BARROSO, C., & Galan, J. The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, v. 27, n. 7, p. 621–636, 2006.

AMASON, A. C. Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 39, n. 1, p. 123-148, 1996.

ARMSTRONG, J. S. Social Irresponsibility in Management. Journal of Business Research. 5: 185-213, 1977.

BANTEL, K. A. & JACKSON, S. E. Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference? Strategic Management Journal, v. 10, S1, p. 107-124, 1989.

BARNARD, C. Functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1938.

BARNEY, J. Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120, 1991.

BASS, B. M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press, 1985.

BERGH, D., AGUINIS, H., HEAVEY, C., KETCHEN, D., BOYD, B., Su, P., LAU, C. & JOO, H. Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, v. 37, p. 477–497, 2016

CALLON, M., COURTIAL, J., & PENAN, H. Cienciometría. La medición de la actividad científica: de la bibliometría a la vigilancia tecnológica. Gijón: Ediciones Trea, 1993.

CANNELLA Jr., A. A., PARK, J-H. & LEE, H-U. Top Management Team Functional Background Diversity and Firm Performance: Examining the Roles of Team Member Colocation and Environmental Uncertainty. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 51, n.4, p. 768-784, 2008.

CARPENTER, M. A., GELETKANYCZ, M. A. & SANDERS, W. G. Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition. Journal of Management, v. 30, n. 6, p. 749-778, 2004.

CASTANIAS, R. & HELFAT, C. The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management, v. 27, p. 661–678, 2001.

CHANDLER, A. D. () Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the american industrial enterprise. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1962.

CHATTERJEE, A. & HAMBRICK, D. C. It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 52, n. 3, p. 351-386, 2007.

CHILD, J. Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-22, 1972.

COHEN, W. M. & LEVINTHAL, D. A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 35, n. 1, p. 128-152, 1990.

CYERT, R. M. & MARCH, J. G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1963.

DALTON, D. R., DAILY, C. M., ELLSTRAND, A. E. & JOHNSON, J. L. Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 19, p. 269-290, 1998.

DAMANPOUR, F. Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 34, n. 3, p. 555-590, 1991.

DIMAGGIO, P. J., & POWELL, W. W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, p. 147-160, 1983.

DING, Y., GOBINDA, G., SCHUBERT, F., & WEIZHONG, Q. Bibliometric information retrieval system (BIRS): A web search interface utilizing bibliometric research results. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 51, n. 13, p. 1190–1204, 2000.

FAMA, E. F. & JENSEN, M. C. Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, v. 26, p. 301-325, 1983.

FINKELSTEIN, S. Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 35, n. 3, p. 505-538, 1992.

FINKELSTEIN, S., & HAMBRICK, D. C. Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 35, p. 484–503, 1990.

GIBSON, C. B. & BIRKINSHAW, J. The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 47, n. 2, p. 209-226, 2004.

GUEDES, V. L. S. & BORSCHIVER, S. Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica. Encontro Nacional de Ciência da Informação, Salvador. Anais do Encontro Nacional de Ciência da Informação. p. 1-18, 2005.

HAMBRICK, D. C. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Research in Organisational Behavior, v. 16, p. 171, 1994.

HAMBRICK, D. C. Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. The Academy of Management Review, v. 32(2), p. 334-343, 2007.

HAMBRICK, D. C., Cho, T. S. & Chen, M-J. The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 41(4), p. 659-684, 1996.

HAMBRICK, D. C.; FINKELSTEIN, S. Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar views of organizations. 369-406. in: Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (eds). Research in organizational behavior. V.9. Greenwich. JAI Press, 1987.

HAMBRICK, D. C., FINKELSTEIN, S. & MOONEY, A. C. Executive Job Demands: New Insights for Explaining Strategic Decisions and Leader Behaviors. The Academy of Management Review, v. 30(3), p. 472-491, 2005.

HAMBRICK, D. C. & FUKUTOMI, G. D. S. The Seasons of a CEO's Tenure. Academy of Management Review, v. 16(4), p. 719-742, 1991.

HAMBRICK, D. C., & MASON, P. Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, v. 9, p. 193–206, 1984.

HE, Z-L. & WONG, P-K. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, v. 15(4), p. 481-494, 2004.

HILLMAN, A. J. & DALZIEL, T. Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives. Academy of Management Review, v. 28(3), p. 383-396, 2003.

HOFSTEDE, G. H. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2001.

JANSEN, J. J. P., VAN DEN BOSCH, F. A. J. & VOLBERDA, H. W. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, v. 52(11), p. 1661-1674, 2006.

JENSEN, M. C. & MECKLING, W. H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 3, p. 305-360, 1976.

LI, J. & TANG, Y. CEO Hubris and Firm Risk Taking in China: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 53(1), p. 45-68, 2010.

LIN, T. & CHENG, Y. Exploring the knowledge network of strategic alliance research: A co-citation analysis. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, v. 8(2), p. 152–160, 2010.

LUBATKIN, M. H., SIMSEK, Z., LING, Y. & Veiga, J. F. Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, v. 32(5), p. 646-672, 2006.

MARCH, J. G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, v. 2(1), p. 71-87, 1991.

MEDEIROS, R., SERRA, F. A. R. & FERREIRA, M. A. P. O tempo de mandato do CEO e o desempenho das organizações: Um estudo em grandes empresas brasileiras. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão, v. 10, p. 60–69, 2011.

MICHEL, J. G. & HAMBRICK, D. C. Diversification Posture and Top Management Team Characteristics. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 35(1), p. 9-37, 1992.

MILLER, D. Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment. Management Science, v.37(1), p. 34-52, 1991.

NERUR, S. P., RASHEED, A. A., & NATARAJAN, V. The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, v. 29, p. 319-336, 2008.

PELLED, L. H., EISENHARDT, K. M. & XIN, K. R. Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance, v. 44(1), p. 1-28, 1999.

PENROSE, E. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.

PETERSON, R. S., SMITH, D. B., MARTORANA, P. V. & OWENS, P. D. The Impact of Chief Executive Officer Personality on Top Management Team Dynamics: One Mechanism by Which Leadership Affects Organizational Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 88(5), p. 795-808, 2003.

PORTER, M. E. The competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Nova Iorque: Free Press, 1985.

RAMOS-RODRIGUEZ, A., & RUIZ-NAVARRO, J. Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, v. 25(10), p. 981–1004, 2004.

SERRA, F. R. & FERREIRA, M. A. P. Emerging determinants of firm performance: A case study research examining the strategy pillars from a resource-based view. Management Research, v. 8, p. 7–24, 2010.

SERRA, F. R., FERREIRA, M. A. P., GUERRAZZI, L., & SCACIOTTA, V. Doing Bibliometric Reviews for the Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management. Iberoamerican Journal Of Strategic Management, v. 17(3), p. 01-16, 2018.

SERRA, F. A. R & LISSONE, J. Los pilares de la estratégia y el éxito de las organizaciones. Revista de Empresa, v. 18, p. 36-48, 2006.

SHAFIQUE, M. Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal, v. 34(1), p. 62–93, 2013.

SHEN, W. & CANNELLA Jr, A. A. Revisiting the Performance Consequences of CEO Succession: The Impacts of Successor Type, Postsuccession Senior Executive Turnover, and Departing CEO Tenure. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 45(4): 717-733, 2002.

TUSHMAN, M. L. & O'REILLY, C. A. Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, v. 38(4), p. 8-30, 1996.

WALDMAN, D. A., RAMIREZ, G. G., HOUSE, R. J. & PURANAM, P. Does Leadership Matter? CEO Leadership Attributes and Profitability under Conditions of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 44(1), p. 134-143, 2001.

ZHANG, Y. & RAJAGOPALAN, N. Once an Outsider, Always an Outsider? CEO Origin, Strategic Change, and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 31, p. 334-346, 2010.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-02-22

Edição

v. 12 n. 1 (2019)

Seção

Artigos Científicos

Licença

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;

O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);

A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);

É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html